On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Thomas F. Burdick wrote:
> Tim Moore writes: > > > > On 3 Dec 2002, Raymond Toy wrote: > > > > > >>>>> "Tim" == Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > Tim> I think it's an indication of how good things really are in the free >Lisp > > > Tim> world that we can find room to complain about threading portability :) > I > > > Tim> would guess that within the next year all the major free Lisps will >have > > > Tim> preemptive, if not native, thread implementations. > > > > > > Including CMUCL? Who's working on that? > > > > At the least, I'm assuming we can steal Dan's SBCL work :) > > I was figuring that's what you meant for CMUCL, but I'm curious: is > CLISP working on threads, too? I don't know specifically of anything going on in the CLISP world, but I thought someone offered a bounty for implementing CLISP threads. Tim
