> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:55:40 -0800 (PST) > From: David Hanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 > tests=IN_REP_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 > version=2.43 > X-Spam-Level: > X-UIDL: pTQ"!F'=!!#UY!!7[*!! > > > --- Marco Antoniotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well, ok, i didn't mean it as a stone-throw at the > > SCL > > > people, more of a lament that there isn't even a > > > semi-portable threading library--things of that > > > nature. > > > > Well, there is. The CLOCC contains a pretty > > portable implementation > > of the "semi-standard" CLIM/Symbolics process > > interface (where a > > "process" is really a "thread"). > > And how is this going to work, say, under CMUCL where > yield() is needed?
It is not as you expect. Look. We all know that this is one of the sore points of the Lisp world. My point is that at least what a minimum interface should look like in CL is understood. Cheers -- Marco Antoniotti ======================================================== NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488 715 Broadway 10th Floor fax +1 - 212 - 995 4122 New York, NY 10003, USA http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu "Hello New York! We'll do what we can!" Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'.
