>From the factory drawings, the Laminate Schedule for the 1990 C&C 37 R was:
C&C 37R Laminate, Hydrex resin used for the entire laminate. Topsides (total thickness 1.16") 1. Gelcoat 2. 1.0 oz. Chop 3. 1.0 oz. Mat 4. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat 5. 1” Aircraft Balsa Core 6. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat Bottom (total thickness 1.20") 1. Gelcoat 2. 1.0 oz. Chop 3. 1.0 oz. Mat 4. C77K/200 Kevlar Fabmat 5. 1” Aircraft Balsa Core 6. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat I imagine the 34R would have bee about the same. The 37+ was a bit thicker, both topsides and bottom. Ken H. On 10 October 2013 16:40, Robert Abbott <[email protected]> wrote: > I always thought the 34R hull was made from kevlar.....am I wrong? > > Bob Abbott > AZURA > C&C 32 - 84 > Halifax, N.S. > > On 2013/10/10 11:40 AM, Hoyt, Mike wrote: > > 34R was made by a completely different company than the 99. I believe was > also not epoxy. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* CnC-List > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *dwight veinot > *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:33 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. > > Mike > > The new hulls are stiff but they hole through a lot easier than the hull > of an older C&C which has solid glass reinforced polyester...Once saw a > power boat in slow reverse with the ss swim ladder supports pointing > aft...go too close to a 34R and there was a hole through the hull...rather > easy to puncture I thought > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Hoyt, Mike <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Curtis >> >> Not really sure how the hulls are weaker. They are not made with solid >> polyester based resin layup though. The C&C 99 is laid up using Epoxy >> not polyester so in many respects could be considered stronger .. Or if >> not stronger than certainly lighter for the equivalent amount of >> strength? >> >> Speaking of Beneteaus. The Beneteau 367 sails well for racing and has a >> huge interior for entertaining or cruising. Is priced about the same as >> a C&C99 on the used market >> >> Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Curtis >> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 10:12 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. >> >> The 99 has a weaker hull than the C&C boats? Right >> >> On 10/9/13, Hoyt, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: >> > There is a 99 one for sale in Nova Scotia. Google Scotia Coast >> Yachts. >> > >> > Have sailed on a 99 numerous times. Is a great boat. >> > >> > Mike >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Marek >> > Fluder >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:16 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. >> > >> > >> > I am opened for C&C 99 but there are few and far between. >> > As for 33-II the admiral would prefer something newer than the 80's, >> > which I do not oppose :) >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Marek >> > >> > >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> > On 2013-10-08, at 11:33 AM, "Richard N. Bush" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > If you're looking at the 320, why not look at the C&C 99? or a >> > nice 33-II ? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Richard >> > 1987 33-II, Ohio River, Mile 584 >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > http://www.cncphotoalbum.com > [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album http://www.cncphotoalbum.com [email protected]
