I agree with Rick's comments.  We were out on a friend's Catalina 42 last 
weekend, and while it was clearly voluminous down below, the lack of handholds 
was very noticeable.  His is probably a late-80s, early 90's boat.  

That said, I wasn't going to say anything... :)  
 Bruce Whitmore

(847) 404-5092 (mobile)
bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net


      From: Rick Brass via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
 To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Cc: Rick Brass <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
 Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:25 AM
 Subject: Re: Stus-List 1983 C&C 35 mark 3 new purchase
   
#yiv4979407916 #yiv4979407916 -- _filtered #yiv4979407916 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 
6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4979407916 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 
3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4979407916 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 
3 2 4;}#yiv4979407916 #yiv4979407916 p.yiv4979407916MsoNormal, #yiv4979407916 
li.yiv4979407916MsoNormal, #yiv4979407916 div.yiv4979407916MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv4979407916 
a:link, #yiv4979407916 span.yiv4979407916MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4979407916 a:visited, #yiv4979407916 
span.yiv4979407916MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4979407916 p 
{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv4979407916 
pre 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;color:black;}#yiv4979407916 
span.yiv4979407916HTMLPreformattedChar {color:black;}#yiv4979407916 
span.yiv4979407916EmailStyle21 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv4979407916 
.yiv4979407916MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv4979407916 
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv4979407916 div.yiv4979407916WordSection1 
{}#yiv4979407916 I have to agree with Joe about the interior volume of the 
CatBenHun boats. Wide beam carried well aft on the newer designs makes for lots 
of interior room. Much more than on any of the boats designed in the 1980s.  
That said, none of the newer Catalinas or Hunters I’ve been aboard (which 
includes several models from 33 to about 45 feet) seem to be set up as good sea 
boats. Few hand holds, few fiddles, big spaces between the cabinets. A local 
Catalina 42 Mk2 owner has stopped taking his boat out on Pamlico Sound when the 
wind is forecast to be above 15 knots because he and his wife were tired of 
getting uncomfortable and bouncing around the interior when underweigh. (The 
Sound averages only about 20 feet deep and develops a significant, short chop 
at 20 knots and above. A Donzi 33 came into my marina yesterday from across the 
Sound; they said they had to turn back twice because of the chop, and it was 
blowing 8 to 12.)  I suspect the better description of the boats I’ve been 
aboard would be “Dock Condo” instead of “Cruising Boat”.  Rick BrassWashington, 
NC    From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Joe 
Della Barba via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 8:51 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Joe Della Barba <j...@dellabarba.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List 1983 C&C 35 mark 3 new purchase  If you look at any 
recent CatBenHun in the 34-36 foot range, any version of the C&C 35 is going to 
seem quite small and cramped. Any of the 35s will of course sail 10x better, 
but that does not always matter to some people.Warning - the "have to have it" 
aft double bunk under the cockpit is a long way from the air coming down the 
forward hatch and right next to the hot engine. It may not be the cruising 
paradise your wife thinks it is ;)  JoeCoquinaC&C 35 MK I  
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


   
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to