At this point sun is giving us less support then microsoft does with IIS.
>From: "E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] SUN don't care about security update ? >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:51:00 +0000 (GMT) > > > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:29:38 +0100 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I'm very disapointed for the sun attitude about security > > upgrade of the cobalt. When there is important holes (like in > > PHP these days), they MUST provide upgrade in the hours like > > all Linux, *BSD, Unix system have do. If you install unoficial > > packages, you can loose warranty, and if I have choosed the > > cobalt is to have a minimum administration: warning from sun on > > security issue, and a link to a package that correct the > > problem. > >IANAL, but I should think Cobalt would have to prove that you >screwed up your system to void the warranty... it would be an >interesting court case to hear a company claim that the warranty >was void because someone manually fixed something that the vendor >negligently failed to. > >I don't know. I wish I could figure out what Sun/Cobalt is >doing. I'd have thought that they'd put US/IIi or US/IIe chips >in a new release of RaQ... if Cobalt could move MIPS chips, >surely Sun/Cobalt could move some UltraSPARCs. > >Think Netra/T1 with GUI admin -- sans proprietary, expensive, >goofy memory boards. > > >Eddy > >Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division >Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national >Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence > >_______________________________________________ >cobalt-security mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
