Hi Michael, THANKS for the updated Qpopper - I've been running your 4.0.4 version and like it much better over the stock version on the RaQ..
I hate to sound green (lame had already been used) -but I don't understand this: >The option ... > > --with-pam=qpop > >... was NOT used for performance reasons. So this >package doesn't use PAM authentication because >POP based authentication against PAM uses a >tremendous amount of ressources without any >actual gains. Isn't PAM support necessary..? How does Qpopper check against an id/s password without PAM..? I guess I just don't understand how it all works.. :-P Thanks Barbara __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
