Alain wrote: >What does "so much faster" mean? Can it handle more concurrent connections, >does it offer greater thruput when fetching mails, does it stress the server >less...? I have not applied this new package to our RAQ yet, and I'm >wondering if I should given that I have no problems with the existing >setup... (never change a running system...?)
I see that Michael Stauber posted with a technical response about PAM, CPU, etc. but I just wanted to respond as a user of this great package. I have 8 e-mail boxes on the same cobalt (different domains and stuff) with the default cobalt Qpopper it would take a noticeable amount of time for Outlook to check all the boxes. With the newer version of Qpopper it must be 2 or 3 times faster. I understand this is anecdotal however after testing I installed this on my production box and I had clients ask if I had upgraded the server. ---------------------------- Michael Aronoff - CIIC, Inc. Calabasas, CA _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
