On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael DeHaan wrote: >> >> Jeff Schroeder wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Fabien Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I agree with you but a dependancies mechanism would be great in >>>> chkconfig, >>>> so that a service could require another being started before itself... >>>> Should post elsewhere :p >>>> >>> >>> That is what upstart is for. >>> >>> >> >> Indeed. Hopefully they figure out what OSS is about at some point. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00711.html
You'd think they'd get it as poorly as Novell is doing with the same "closed open sauce" business model. Redhat is always open and is prospering. > I should also elaborate that dependencies on cobbler to dhcpd doesn't work, > as we also allow dnsmasq as a > "supported" option. > > However with all the recent templating changes, I'm not positive that still > works. Still, haven't heard any complaints. > > It seems with templating the way it is now (i..e good and doing all the work > for you) there's really not much reason to use it. > > It does seem easier to just support the BIND/dhcpd option though ... as that > means there are less codepaths to maintain. I'd be interested to find out how many people actually let cobbler mudge their dns (no offense). More importantly, I'd be interested in how reliable it is and how it treats special cases such as dynamic zones if at all. -- Jeff Schroeder Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix. http://www.digitalprognosis.com _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
