> The survey has some notes on who is using DHCP management and who is > using DNS management. I need to gather up those results shortly.
Which survey? I'd like to participate[1]. > We (Red Hat) are using it for DNS some for our own networks -- though > I'd need to check about how extensively. My feeling is that cobbler should definitely *not* do DNS or DHCP - that would make it very much harder to put into networks that already have such facilities. The Unix way is for each package to do one thing and do it well. cobbler seems to do remote installation very well (now that I've stopped being a complete numpty) - there's no need for it to do other things as well. It's not like setting up bind or dhcpd are particularly difficult... What would be useful is for cobbler to have the ability to update bind - but I haven't read enough of the docs yet to know whether that already exists :-) Vic. [1] Not that I've had much luck with feedback to RH lately - but I live in hope... _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
