Vic wrote: >> The survey has some notes on who is using DHCP management and who is >> using DNS management. I need to gather up those results shortly. >> > > Which survey? I'd like to participate[1]. > >
Thread here: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cobbler/2009-April/003881.html >> We (Red Hat) are using it for DNS some for our own networks -- though >> I'd need to check about how extensively. >> > > My feeling is that cobbler should definitely *not* do DNS or DHCP - that > would make it very much harder to put into networks that already have such > facilities. > This is why these features are optional, and off by default. > The Unix way is for each package to do one thing and do it well. cobbler > seems to do remote installation very well (now that I've stopped being a > complete numpty) - there's no need for it to do other things as well. It's > not like setting up bind or dhcpd are particularly difficult... > > It's not ok to be good at both walking and chewing gum at the same time? Read: https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/wiki/ManageDhcp https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/wiki/ManageDns > What would be useful is for cobbler to have the ability to update bind - > but I haven't read enough of the docs yet to know whether that already > exists :-) > It does. > Vic. > > [1] Not that I've had much luck with feedback to RH lately - but I live in > hope... > > _______________________________________________ > cobbler mailing list > [email protected] > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler > _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
