Hi, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> Hi Julia, >> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: >> > There is now a git repository with the coccinelle sources at >> > https://github.com/coccinelle >> > >> I would not have raised the issue before, but this looks just a bare >> import of every tarball. The point of having access to a repository >> would be to see that feature X, bug Y or change Z resulted in a given >> changeset. I would understand that not everybody is gonna hack >> coccinelle for fun, and that you may not even want that, but providing >> commit granularity would be nice, and appreciated. > > No. I don't want the responsibility of the commits having to make sense. > I don't see any use of my development style serving as entertainment for > others. > > The only use for it that I can see is if someone wants to add some > fairly independent feature on their own, eg support for another language. > I'm fine with that, where is the _internal_ coccinelle documentation ?
- Arnaud _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
