On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Julia,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > There is now a git repository with the coccinelle sources at
> >> > https://github.com/coccinelle
> >> >
> >> I would not have raised the issue before, but this looks just a bare
> >> import of every tarball. The point of having access to a repository
> >> would be to see that feature X, bug Y or change Z resulted in a given
> >> changeset. I would understand that not everybody is gonna hack
> >> coccinelle for fun, and that you may not even want that, but providing
> >> commit granularity would be nice, and appreciated.
> >
> > No. I don't want the responsibility of the commits having to make sense.
> > I don't see any use of my development style serving as entertainment for
> > others.
> >
> > The only use for it that I can see is if someone wants to add some
> > fairly independent feature on their own, eg support for another language.
> >
> I'm fine with that, where is the _internal_ coccinelle documentation ?
Unfortunately, there is absolutely none, except what is written in papers
and in comments in the code. Some of the comments in the parts I didn't
write are quite helpful, though (C parser, and matching and
transformation). I can't really judge if my own comments (SmPL parser)
are much help :)
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
