On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Karl Goiser wrote: > Your first option looks better to me! > :-) > > All I’m saying is that Objective C is a very mature language now Depending on your perspective, you can say this for many languages. But only the dead ones do not evolve (Objective-C, does it, though)
> and if it has been able to get by You should ask the *developers*, not the *language*, if they experience issues and if they feel comfortable to workaround these issues. > without adding this extra layer of complexity, why introduce it for an edge > case to address a situation where people are expecting it to act like C++? I wouldn't say it is an edge case. If you develop small applications in a one-man company, and no plugins, you may feel this as a minor issue. Others won't agree, and actually have a big problem. Namespaces for Objective-C will likely not require the same feature set than what is available in C++ (e.g., no argument dependent lookup). There is also no need to do this. The only thing that should be considered when introducing namespaces in my opinion is, that it should be seamlessly integrated into Objective-C++. The negative asset against C++ made from a few posters here, is futile - Objective-C will have and be Objective-C++ as well. This requires to consider C++ syntax - and IMHO, regarding namespaces, it isn't ugly at all. > > Apple, after all is all about being simple and clean, and its language of > choice should reflect that because, after all, it’s the developers who create > the simple and clean. In my opinion, Objective C is an embodiment of the > Apple attitude. From the developers view, using namespaces shouldn't appear to be complex and its usage should be certainly optional. IMHO, Objective-C could stay without having namespaces. C is required to use the same approach to avoid name conflicts: prefixes. However, introducing namespaces to Objective-C++ could be worthwhile to investigate if this is feasable. IFF, then integrating namespaces with C++ possibly could be done seamlessly. Andreas > > My favourite saying of all time is, “to a person with a hammer, everything > looks like a nail.” Objective C is a screw, and you use a screwdriver on it, > nor a hammer. > > > As far as versioning issues from the same class in two bundles is concerned, > if the class works to spec, there’s no problem. If it doesn’t, that’s a bug, > and wouldn’t the bundles have to be updated anyway? > > Karl > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
