On Nov 9, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Andreas Grosam <agro...@onlinehome.de> wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Karl Goiser wrote: >> without adding this extra layer of complexity, why introduce it for an edge >> case to address a situation where people are expecting it to act like C++? > I wouldn't say it is an edge case. If you develop small applications in a > one-man company, and no plugins, you may feel this as a minor issue. > Others won't agree, and actually have a big problem. Remember the original case that prompted this discussion: the screen saver engine loading two different screen saver bundles that define different versions of classes with the same name. The same situation can arise with Quick Look: the Quick Look daemon might reuse worker processes. If you have two apps installed whose generators use different versions of the same framework, you could get a conflict. This really isn't an edge case. --Kyle Sluder_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
