On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Ian Joyner wrote: <snip> So, in other words, you prefer "polymorphic runtime resolved" symbols over "compile-time resolved symbols" (like in C++).
I just don't understand, why this makes C++ namespace syntax ugly, and why you still state that C++ namespace is inflexible and problematic, and inflict more issues than it solves. While this is not true (IMO), I don't understand what this (and Windows, C pointers, and gotos, etc.) has to do with a new namespace feature for Objective-C/C++. I fear these divagations are contra-productive. > The programming community needs to learn what the phrase 'separation of > concerns' really means. I would certainly agree about some "polymorphic dynamically resolved" namespace feature in Objective-C. I'm awaiting your lecture. Andreas_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
