> On 6 Mar 2015, at 4:25 pm, Ken Thomases <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So you're saying it's a bug? > > I think the bug is that IB hides the existence of the sub-NIB. If IB > presented the sub-NIB with all of the usual placeholders and put a Shared > User Defaults Controller into it when you set a binding on it, etc., that > would help make this clear. > > Also, it's a bug that IB will blithely let you create connections from > objects in the sub-NIB to objects outside the sub-NIB when those connections > won't survive to runtime.
I got well and truly confused by all this first time I did anything with view-based tables. The way IB has been "adapted" to handle this architecture is one collosal kludge. I wonder if any of us would be happy to release code that bad? --Graham _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
