(2-mail-pattern, let's hope it works)
I was suggesting we remove it from the FOM as I see no reason to connect sitemap programmatic artifacts in the flow realm. Read the title, it starts with [flow], is the context clear enough?
Yes. I'm very sorry to have read more than you typed. It was not out of paranoia, but because I _am_ genuinely concerned that Flow must become a integral part of the community hivemind in order to succeed, and pushing it while dropping something else might be detrimental to that effect. But I misread you, apparently, so never mind. The caveat was already there. The concern remains.
Anyway, I think we got the point that you people there at OT have such a great and better way of doing stateful control using actions.
What about stopping your "Stefano will kill actions under our feet" paranoia and throw some code in the scratchpad to show your point?
maybe both sides can learn something in the process.
As I carefully typed before reluctantly injecting my own little piece of concern into this discussion:
<quote>Oh. Do please read this as a neutral observation, will you? I'm not into flames. If I'm wrong with my observation, just say so and I'll withdraw to my cave. ;-)</quote>
Thanks, Stefano. Is this a Cultural Revolution thing or what? Could you please play the ball instead of the man?
</Steven> -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
