> From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On 08.Oct.2002 -- 10:34 PM, Jeff Turner wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Christian Haul wrote: > > > On 08.Oct.2002 -- 01:34 PM, Piroumian Konstantin wrote: > > ... > > Yes!! > > > I think that's really great :) It nicely separates the two > concerns. > > It's dead simple in concept and implementation. It's > (AFAICT) powerful > > enough to meet all use-cases. Best of all, module implementors > > (XMLModule in my > > case) don't need to worry about chaining. Eg, for Forrest > we can have: > > > > <component-instance class="...ChainingMetaModule" name="skin"> > > <input-module name="request-param"/> > > <input-module name="forrestconf"/> > > <input-module name="defaults"/> > > </component-instance> > > > > <component-instance class="...XMLModule" name="forrestconf"> > > <config>resource:///forrestconf.xml</config> > > </component-instance> > > > > > > Any downsides? > > > > Big +1 > > +1 (of course :-)
+1 for sure At last we could agree on this! Great! (Back from English courses ;) . -- Konstantin > > Chris. > -- > C h r i s t i a n H a u l > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
