On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:38:45PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Piroumian Konstantin wrote: > > Configuration of input modules is a little different matter. If you have > > good suggestions on how to configure them in the sitemap then nobody will > > have objections, I think. What we couldn't agree on all this time was the > > modularity and module chaining implementation. Jeff, Chris, am I wrong?
Right. > Ok, let's try this: I made a suggestion for a simple InputModule interface > today - nobody really complained about it - so this should be the way to go, > right? Yes. > Now, it seems that you all have come to a conclusion for chaining etc. Just > post an interface/description for this and we can agree on it or change it > until we all are happy. I thought these were completely separate issues. Chaining requires no API change. We can implement chaining with the existing interface, or your cleaned-up interface; it doesn't matter. It's a pity the threads happened at the same time. I can write up a summary of the chaining debate if you like, so other committers can join in.. --Jeff > Carsten > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
