Jeff Turner wrote: > > Now, it seems that you all have come to a conclusion for > chaining etc. Just > > post an interface/description for this and we can agree on it > or change it > > until we all are happy. > > I thought these were completely separate issues. Chaining requires no API > change. We can implement chaining with the existing interface, or your > cleaned-up interface; it doesn't matter. > > It's a pity the threads happened at the same time. I can write up a > summary of the chaining debate if you like, so other committers can join > in.. > Yes, thanks, Jeff - this seems to be a great idea - we can then combine the threads and finalize (terminate?) this chapter.
Thanks Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
