> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Jeff Turner wrote: > > > > > > > > Just a silly question: are you joking or do you consider this > > > seriously? > > > > Absolutely :) See the other thread. It separates two > concerns that are > > currently mixed, and makes module implementation _much_ simpler. I > > think Chris, Konstantin and I are all very happy with it. Now's the > > time to raise objections.. > > > Yes, ok, if you are all happy with this...I can't stop you > from doing this. I personally don't like the concept, because > the configuration is static in the cocoon.xconf - I don't see > this in the sitemap. > > And yes: I still believe in SoC, which means a usual Cocoon > user has only to edit (and know) the sitemap - he should not > care about the cocoon.xconf.
Configuration of input modules is a little different matter. If you have good suggestions on how to configure them in the sitemap then nobody will have objections, I think. What we couldn't agree on all this time was the modularity and module chaining implementation. Jeff, Chris, am I wrong? Konstantin > > Carsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
