What about simply map:pipe[s]?
Yes, why not - if noone comes up with a better name, we will use that.
I'd prefer to keep the current naming instead of that one.
For consistency it would be map:pipeline in the components, and map:pipe
in the "beefy" part.
pipeline generator transformer ...
pipe generate transform ...
Inverting it is not so cool IMHO. I haven't yet seen users complain it's
not understandable and I've never had that problem myself.
I aggree - but that would not be backwards compatible.... :-/
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
