Michael Melhem wrote: > I recall suggesting map:pipe in an earlier discussion because it > would confirm to "noun-verb" convention that already exists in > the sitemap. > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103642811405234&w=2 > > However, there the issue of "backwards compatibly" as Torsten points > out. > Okay, we *could* (don't know right now if it's good) deprecate the 2.0.x map:pipelines and map:pipeline and allow for a transition period both versions for defining pipelines: map:pipeline and map:pipe. And the in 2.1 newly introduced components are then map:pipelines resp. map:pipeline. At least this would be consistent.
What do you think? Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
