Re: [RT]: Names for pipeline components section

[Vadim Gritsenko]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

Michael Melhem wrote:

I recall suggesting map:pipe in an earlier discussion because it
would confirm to "noun-verb" convention that already exists in the sitemap.

... the only problem being that also pipe is a noun, it does not mean "somebody who makes pipelines". Currently, generator is "somebody who generates", transformer is "somebody who transforms", etc.

But "pipe" noun does not describe an actor, "pipe" is passive... "Piper" could be better but it means "somebody who plays pipe"...


Vadim

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103642811405234&w=2

However, there the issue of "backwards compatibly" as Torsten points
out.

Okay, we *could* (don't know right now if it's good) deprecate
the 2.0.x map:pipelines and map:pipeline and allow for a transition
period both versions for defining pipelines: map:pipeline and
map:pipe. And the in 2.1 newly introduced components are then map:pipelines
resp. map:pipeline.
At least this would be consistent.

What do you think?

Carsten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]