On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: > >>>What about simply map:pipe[s]? > >>> > >> > >>Yes, why not - if noone comes up with a better name, we will use that. > > > > > >I'd prefer to keep the current naming instead of that one. > > > >For consistency it would be map:pipeline in the components, and map:pipe > >in the "beefy" part. > > > > pipeline generator transformer ... > > pipe generate transform ... > > > >Inverting it is not so cool IMHO. I haven't yet seen users complain it's > >not understandable and I've never had that problem myself. > > I aggree - but that would not be backwards compatible.... :-/
I recall suggesting map:pipe in an earlier discussion because it would confirm to "noun-verb" convention that already exists in the sitemap. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103642811405234&w=2 However, there the issue of "backwards compatibly" as Torsten points out. Regards, Michael Melhem > -- > Torsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
