On 30/3/03 2:43 pm, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is what I would like to see:
1) no functions without an object namespace. This is to imply that all non-prefixed functions belong to the flow. Provides coherent cognitive context.
I don't understand that.... What do you mean by "function with(out) object namespace?
I mean functions without an object up front.
info() <- bad log.info() <- good
4) the following functions
Flow Object: flow.import() -> imports another flowscript
Hmmm... Should we allow cross-language (when/if we're going to have it) flowscripts interaction? Because otherwise I'd prefer a name such as "interpreter"....
I don't get it. What's wrong with the name flow?
Cocoon Object: cocoon.sendPage(uri, dict) -> sends a pipeline to the client
cocoon.sendPageAndWait(uri, dict) -> sends a pipeline to the client and save the continuation.
cocoon.process(uri, dict, output
Stefano... This one was cut as well... Can you please forward the rest????
Oh, #$&*! No, i can't, that message wasn't stored in my sent folder :/
grrrr
I hate these things.
Stefano.
