Flow Object:
flow.import() -> imports another flowscript
import is a JavaScript keyword. We can't use it as the name of a function
It doesn't. It's up to the embedding how this is accomplished. Rhino and Spidermonkey (Mozilla engines) have "load()".Hmmm... Should we allow cross-language (when/if we're going to have it)
flowscripts interaction? Because otherwise I'd prefer a name such as
"interpreter"....
I don't get it. What's wrong with the name flow?
I think the same as Pier here, you merely don't include a flow, but include or import another javascript file. Using flow here, I think, leads the user to false assumption, that this is flow specific. For instance using jruby or another great scripting language (jython, ...), this would work somewhat different like Module::include in jruby or import in jython.
Ok, I agree with you people.
I wonder, doesn't javascript have such a native facility for importing external scripts? I would be surprised if it didn't.
Regards, Chris
