Am Son, 2003-03-30 um 21.32 schrieb Stefano Mazzocchi:
4) the following functions
Flow Object: flow.import() -> imports another flowscript
Hmmm... Should we allow cross-language (when/if we're going to have it) flowscripts interaction? Because otherwise I'd prefer a name such as "interpreter"....
I don't get it. What's wrong with the name flow?
I think the same as Pier here, you merely don't include a flow, but include or import another javascript file. Using flow here, I think, leads the user to false assumption, that this is flow specific. For instance using jruby or another great scripting language (jython, ...), this would work somewhat different like Module::include in jruby or import in jython.
Ok, I agree with you people.
I wonder, doesn't javascript have such a native facility for importing external scripts? I would be surprised if it didn't.
Chris? (you are the javascript guru around here :)
Stefano.
