Am Son, 2003-03-30 um 21.32 schrieb Stefano Mazzocchi:
> >>4) the following functions > >> > >>Flow Object: > >> flow.import() -> imports another flowscript > > > > > > > Hmmm... Should we allow cross-language (when/if we're going to have it) > > flowscripts interaction? Because otherwise I'd prefer a name such as > > "interpreter".... > > I don't get it. What's wrong with the name flow? > I think the same as Pier here, you merely don't include a flow, but include or import another javascript file. Using flow here, I think, leads the user to false assumption, that this is flow specific. For instance using jruby or another great scripting language (jython, ...), this would work somewhat different like Module::include in jruby or import in jython. -- Jakob
