you do until everyone happens to leave and someone else steals ops another option would be to make +channels start with no ops but be otherwise normal
so an ircop could use /opmode in there if nessacerry >From: Jeekay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Braden Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Plus Channels >Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:09:54 +0100 (BST) > >How to emulate a + channel (this assumes no ircops with /opmode :)): > >/join #channeliwanttouse >/mode #channeliwanttouse +nt >/mode #channeliwanttouse -o mynick > >Huzzah :) You now have the instant convenience of an uncontrollable >channel from your own desk. > >GK > >On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Braden Temme wrote: > > You are missing the point. The point isn't whether they are hard to >enforce but the ability of us > > to use them. There should of been an Fline created for them enabling or >disabling them. They > > shouldn't of ripped them out of the code altogether. Entropy, if you >had a problem with them, > > then you should be able to disable them with a function :cP It would >be a nice feature. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
