-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:33:45PM +0100, Chris Crowther wrote: > > On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 2:40 pm, Richard Smith wrote: > > > > > > regitrations from the same e-mail sub-domain would likely be queried. > > > > > > Are queried ;) > > > > Thought they might be, but I didn't want to speak authoratively on your > > policies:) > > > > What's this? > > gpg: Signature made Thu 17 Oct 2002 08:33:47 PM CEST using DSA key ID 0C93FE11 > gpg: requesting key 0C93FE11 from wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net ... > gpg: key 0C93FE11: public key imported > gpg: key E5759045: secret key without public key - skipped > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > gpg: imported: 1 > gpg: BAD signature from "Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > Is it me? Or are you signing wrongly? > (normally it works for me)
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri 18 Oct 2002 19:25:47 NZDT) --] gpg: Signature made Fri 18 Oct 2002 07:33:47 NZDT using DSA key ID 0C93FE11 gpg: Good signature from "Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: aka "Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: aka "Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3621 CFA6 FFF6 B574 E419 2073 CFC6 E5D2 0C93 FE11 Works for me.... - -- In war it is not men, but the man who counts. -- Napoleon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Only when you are sure they have you, can you stop being paranoid iD8DBQE9r6mkcAgRpy8z8UQRAoAgAJ4tXsQbd5tr3OsonOO15+nJkSgGOwCfaFp0 oY3TXgDzF1H0P3RlNHZmIDI= =uCUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
