Dwrite commented on PR #4339: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4339#issuecomment-3106373467
> I think that doubling a caret is something much simpler for contributors to do to write tests than to understand the rules about when a single caret works and when a double one is required. I agree that doubling carets is simple in principle — and I’ve tried that approach. Unfortunately, it still breaks idempotency in some cases, especially when Quidem interprets and rewrites the input/output. That’s why I went for a solution that preserves the original SQL and ensures the tests remain stable across runs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
