Dwrite commented on PR #4339: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4339#issuecomment-3111717173
> Quidem has to do with carets. You're right — Quidem has nothing to do with carets. The issue I mentioned is unrelated to Quidem itself. When using ^^ (double caret), I've seen that repeated evaluation or type checking (e.g. inside f.checkScalar) can produce inconsistent results. This breaks idempotency in tests, since the same expression might yield different results across passes. That's why I avoided using ^^ even though it works syntactically. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
