commits  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7296] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(CAST(10/0 AS BIGINT)) [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite-avatica-go) branch dependabot/go_modules/golang.org/x/crypto-0.45.0 created (now 733c743) github-bot
• [PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.36.0 to 0.45.0 [calcite-avatica-go] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument mbudiu
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner tjbanghart
• (calcite) branch main updated: Replace `replace` with `toLinux` mbudiu
• [PR] Replace `replace` with `toLinux` [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace `replace` with `toLinux` [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace `replace` with `toLinux` [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6239, CALCITE-6263] Add PostGIS Dialect to Apache Calcite [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Support unparse special syntax when operator is LAMBDA/MERGE/UNPIVOT [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Add common test for SqlNode unparse after deep copy and fix operators missing createCall [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Add common test for SqlNode unparse after deep copy and fix operators missing createCall [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Add common test for SqlNode unparse after deep copy and fix operators missing createCall [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Add common test for SqlNode unparse after deep copy and fix operators missing createCall [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7301] Add common test for SqlNode unparse after deep copy and missing createCall in operators [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7265] Allow RelOptFixture.relFn to be used with VolcanoPlanner [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] RelNodeVisitCoverageTest for test RelShuttle visit coverage [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-6176] JOIN_SUB_QUERY_TO_CORRELATE rule incorrectly handles EXISTS in LEFT JOIN ON clause zhenchen
• [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7295] RexSimplify should simplify a division with a NULL argument [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-6176] JOIN_SUB_QUERY_TO_CORRELATE rule incorrectly handles EXISTS in LEFT JOIN ON clause [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6176] JOIN_SUB_QUERY_TO_CORRELATE rule incorrectly handles EXISTS in LEFT JOIN ON clause [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6176] JOIN_SUB_QUERY_TO_CORRELATE rule incorrectly handles EXISTS in LEFT JOIN ON clause [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6176] JOIN_SUB_QUERY_TO_CORRELATE rule incorrectly handles EXISTS in LEFT JOIN ON clause [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7145] RexSimplify should not simplify IS NULL(10/0) zabetak
• [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when… [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when… [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when… [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when… [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when using option "build and run [tests] using Intellij IDEA" vladimirsitnikov
  • (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when using option "build and run [tests] using Intellij IDEA" vladimirsitnikov
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when using option "build and run [tests] using Intellij IDEA" [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when using option "build and run [tests] using Intellij IDEA" [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-4947] Checkstyle fails on classes generated by Intellij when using option "build and run [tests] using Intellij IDEA" [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7272] Subqueries cannot be decorrelated if have set op [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7292] Replace "case when true then deptno else null end" with a non-simplifiable expression zhenchen
• [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES transforms wrong plan, when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5465] Rule of AGGREGATE_EXPAND_DISTINCT_AGGREGATES produces an incorrect plan when sql has distinct agg-call with rollup [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7197] UnsupportedOperationException when using dynamic parameters inside ROW expression [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7197] UnsupportedOperationException when using dynamic parameters inside ROW expression [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7293] MAP constructor cannot handle VARIANT values that need casts mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7293] MAP constructor cannot handle VARIANT values that need… [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7293] MAP constructor cannot handle VARIANT values that need… [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7293] MAP constructor cannot handle VARIANT values that need… [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7289] Select NULL subquery throwing exception [calcite] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages