[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16376627#comment-16376627
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-14260:
----------------------------------------------
For what it's worth, I would prefer moving out of using {{Pair}} all over the
place and use specific classes instead. Just to illustrate, I'm talking of
adding a {{SizeEstimate}} (or other name) with 2 fields {{partitionCount}} and
{{meanSize}} for instance instead of the pair used for size estimates. I reckon
this technically add a bit more lines of code over reusing a {{Pair}} class,
but I feel it largely pay for itself in term of code clarity and
error-proneness. If you get a {{LongLongPair}} from a method, you constantly
have to double check which field is which, which I personally find annoying and
is easy to mess up.
Anyway, that remark obviously apply to all usage of {{Pair}} while I understand
you intent here is just to avoid boxing, but in the off-change that there is
agreement on the remarks above, I figured this may be a good occasion to start
cleaning this up as well rather than add more "pair" classes.
> Refactor pair to avoid boxing longs/ints
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-14260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jeff Jirsa
> Assignee: Jeff Jirsa
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> We uses Pair<X,Y> all over the place, and in many cases either/both of X and
> Y are primitives (ints, longs), and we end up boxing them into Integers and
> Longs. We should have specialized versions that take primitives.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
