[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16383234#comment-16383234
]
Jeff Jirsa commented on CASSANDRA-14260:
----------------------------------------
Force pushed, refactored to have specialized inner classes anywhere a Pair was
used with primitives. Branch
[here|https://github.com/jeffjirsa/cassandra/commits/trunk-pair-refactor] with
some fixes. Tests will run
[here|https://circleci.com/gh/jeffjirsa/cassandra/tree/trunk-pair-refactor] . 2
commits, one with the main change, and a second to add {{hashCode()}} and
{{equals()}}
[~bdeggleston] interested in review ( or [~slebresne] , not sure if you're
still up for reviews ). There's at least one or two name changes I'm not
thrilled with, so please nit pick the naming, I dont like them, but I'm low on
creativity.
> Refactor pair to avoid boxing longs/ints
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-14260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jeff Jirsa
> Assignee: Jeff Jirsa
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> We uses Pair<X,Y> all over the place, and in many cases either/both of X and
> Y are primitives (ints, longs), and we end up boxing them into Integers and
> Longs. We should have specialized versions that take primitives.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
