[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16397045#comment-16397045 ]
Jeff Jirsa commented on CASSANDRA-7622: --------------------------------------- At NGCC I tried to make an argument for their general availabiluty, guarded behind some experimental flag that gave us the opportunity to change the API or remove them later I believe there are some general purpose use cases (for example, analogous to foreign data wrappers) that I expect real users to appreciate, but I also realize that it’s a young feature that is likely going to change/evolve I agree we should guard it. I’d like to see it in arbitrary keyspaces, but I don’t necessarily feel it needs to happen immediately , maybe in v5 > Implement virtual tables > ------------------------ > > Key: CASSANDRA-7622 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tupshin Harper > Assignee: Chris Lohfink > Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.x > > > There are a variety of reasons to want virtual tables, which would be any > table that would be backed by an API, rather than data explicitly managed and > stored as sstables. > One possible use case would be to expose JMX data through CQL as a > resurrection of CASSANDRA-3527. > Another is a more general framework to implement the ability to expose yaml > configuration information. So it would be an alternate approach to > CASSANDRA-7370. > A possible implementation would be in terms of CASSANDRA-7443, but I am not > presupposing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org