[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17422730#comment-17422730
]
Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-16976:
----------------------------------------------
bq. I think it should be sorted and it should have same order I mean ... why
not? wdyt Brandon Williams?
As Aleksei pointed out, the VT output is sorted by the PK and clustering
columns..._by default_. Depending on how the user constructs their query, this
could be different, right? I don't think we should get too hung up on making
them match since nodetool has no equivalent flexibility. Nodetool will
eventually give way to VTs as the primary management tool, and VTs should act
like normal CQL tables without any special casing.
> Make nodetool compactionstats and sstable_tasks consistent
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-16976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Feature/Virtual Tables, Tool/nodetool
> Reporter: Aleksei Zotov
> Assignee: Aleksei Zotov
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> Currently there is a difference in the output if {{nodetool compactionstats}}
> command and {{sstable_tasks}} virtual table (originally introduced by
> CASSANDRA-14457). They need to be aligned. The differences are:
>
> ||nodetool||VT||Comment||
> |percentComplete|completion_ratio|column naming is different only|
> |completed|progress|column naming is different only|
> |compaction type|kind|column naming is different only|
> |sstables|NA| |
> Additionally, please, update necessary documentation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
