[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17422762#comment-17422762
]
Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-16976:
----------------------------------------------
Thanks for digging into this further, this is revealing.
bq. Even though the current logic seems to be reasonable, "unit" name is
confusing.
It is, but I can't think of something better that isn't significantly more
verbose, and though it can be misinterpreted (as I certainly did) "unit" is
correct. I think we'll just need to make sure the documentation calls this out
later.
> Make nodetool compactionstats and sstable_tasks consistent
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-16976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Feature/Virtual Tables, Tool/nodetool
> Reporter: Aleksei Zotov
> Assignee: Aleksei Zotov
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> Currently there is a difference in the output if {{nodetool compactionstats}}
> command and {{sstable_tasks}} virtual table (originally introduced by
> CASSANDRA-14457). They need to be aligned. The differences are:
>
> ||nodetool||VT||Comment||
> |percentComplete|completion_ratio|column naming is different only|
> |completed|progress|column naming is different only|
> |compaction type|kind|column naming is different only|
> |sstables|NA| |
> Additionally, please, update necessary documentation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
