[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17428236#comment-17428236
]
Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-16976:
----------------------------------------------
bq. I just start/finish compaction manually on some hardcoded data. Taking into
account this functionality is trivial (and not mission critical) and we need to
test output format only, I feel this is more than enough.
I agree. +1 to the patch.
> Make nodetool compactionstats and sstable_tasks consistent
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-16976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16976
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Feature/Virtual Tables, Tool/nodetool
> Reporter: Aleksei Zotov
> Assignee: Aleksei Zotov
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.x
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently there is a difference in the output if {{nodetool compactionstats}}
> command and {{sstable_tasks}} virtual table (originally introduced by
> CASSANDRA-14457). They need to be aligned. The differences are:
>
> ||nodetool||VT||Comment||
> |percentComplete|completion_ratio|column naming is different only|
> |completed|progress|column naming is different only|
> |compaction type|kind|column naming is different only|
> |sstables|NA| |
> Additionally, please, update necessary documentation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
