commits  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Error creating VLAN [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Error creating VLAN [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] UI: Fix slider component in global settings with `Range` type [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature and bug templates [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch issue_template created (now 1cf9185e27b) dahn
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: feature and bug templates dahn
• [I] [UI] Metris calculations mismatch - Allocated vs Used [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 10182-expunge-vm updated (3b1a83a3615 -> ecb725fb1d2) dahn
• (cloudstack-documentation) branch 4.20 updated: note: AMQP configuration change (#463) dahn
• (cloudstack-documentation) branch 4.19 updated: Updating security group documentation (#469) dahn
• [PR] add workaround from issue reporter [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add workaround from issue reporter [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add workaround from issue reporter [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add workaround from issue reporter [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add workaround from issue reporter [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] cleanup VM IP after expunge in redundant VPC [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 10182-expunge-vm updated: add workaround from issue reporter dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 10182-expunge-vm created (now 35fe19f096d) dahn
• [I] Expunge vm not release in-memory dhcp record in vpc virtual route correctly [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expunge vm not release in-memory dhcp record in vpc redundant virtual route correctly [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expunge vm not release in-memory dhcp record in vpc redundant virtual route correctly [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expunge vm not release in-memory dhcp record in vpc redundant virtual route correctly [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch main updated: network: Add BGP+EVPN+VXLAN script to main repository and Agent package (#9778) dahn
• [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs while preparing & unpreparing the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs while preparing & unpreparing the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PowerFlex] Add & Remove PowerFlex/ScaleIO MDMs for the storage SDC connections [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack-www) branch staging-site updated: new lines dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch main updated (d659de476 -> 93fe84fa9) dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch blog-fix deleted (was d2b5522c2) dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch staging-site updated: Blog fix (#277) dahn
• [GH] (cloudstack-www): Workflow run "Lint" is working again! GitBox
• (cloudstack-www) branch blog-fix updated (ba7739227 -> d2b5522c2) dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch blog-fix updated: more blog fixes dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated (ab76d3c9ccb -> e2cfddb1b6a) dahn
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: Merge branch '4.19' into 4.20 dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch staging-site updated: Update alphabetic order in users.mdx dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch staged-site updated: Automated CloudStack https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org staging website deployment with cloudstack-www branch @ cc141ea11593c561167107266a5ed3f143a01716 github-bot
• (cloudstack-www) branch staging-site updated: Create 2025-01-13-Unauthorised-access-to-annotations (#276) dahn
• (cloudstack-www) branch staging-site updated (e4cffc602 -> 35b343742) dahn
• [GH] (cloudstack-www): Workflow run "Lint" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (cloudstack-www): Workflow run "Lint" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (cloudstack-www): Workflow run "Lint" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (cloudstack-www): Workflow run "Lint" failed! GitBox
• [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Agents log rotation is unstable [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Certificate error when downloading ISO (keystore not set up correctly) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Certificate error when downloading ISO (keystore not set up correctly) [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 4.19 updated: systemvm: fix keystore is reset when patch a systemvm (#9900) dahn
• Re: [PR] systemvm: fix keystore is reset when patch a systemvm [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 4.19 updated: no retrieval of null hosts (#10175) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.19 updated: upgrade: consider multiple hypervisors and secondary storages (#10046) dahn
• [I] Possible missing documentation on plugins [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Possible missing documentation on plugins [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Possible missing documentation on plugins [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Possible to scroll past the usage records table's footer [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Possible to scroll past the usage records table's footer [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Purge usage records action shown to users without access to `removeRawUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Purge usage records action shown to users without access to `removeRawUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Generate usage records action shown to users without access to `generateUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Generate usage records action shown to users without access to `generateUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Usage server metrics section shown to users without access to the API [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Usage server metrics section shown to users without access to the API [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages