jw3 commented on a change in pull request #431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/431#discussion_r512154007
##########
File path:
daffodil-runtime1/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/processors/DataProcessor.scala
##########
@@ -691,41 +702,38 @@ class DataProcessor private (
class ParseResult(dp: DataProcessor, override val resultState: PState)
extends DFDL.ParseResult
- with WithDiagnosticsImpl
- with ErrorHandler {
+ with WithDiagnosticsImpl {
/**
- * To be successful here, we need to capture xerces parse/validation
+ * To be successful here, we need to capture parse/validation
* errors and add them to the Diagnostics list in the PState.
*
- * @param state the initial parse state.
+ * @param bytes the parsed Infoset
*/
def validateResult(bytes: Array[Byte]): Unit = {
Assert.usage(resultState.processorStatus eq Success)
- val schemaURIStrings =
resultState.infoset.asInstanceOf[InfosetElement].runtimeData.schemaURIStringsForFullValidation
- try {
- val bis = new java.io.ByteArrayInputStream(bytes)
- Validator.validateXMLSources(schemaURIStrings, bis, this)
- } catch {
- //
- // Some SAX Parse errors are thrown even if you specify an error handler
to the
- // validator.
- //
- // So we also need this catch
- //
- case e: SAXException =>
- resultState.validationErrorNoContext(e)
+
+ val v = dp.validationMode match {
Review comment:
OK. So the only issue is that `schemaURIStringsForFullValidation1` is
private so it cant recurse if I copy that logic, otherwise it fits nicely in
there. Dont know if it runs.
Any thoughts on opening up `schemaURIStringsForFullValidation1`? Ill commit
it as is for review.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
