kfaraz commented on code in PR #14616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/14616#discussion_r1268429411


##########
server/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/server/coordination/SegmentLoadDropHandler.java:
##########
@@ -789,15 +789,20 @@ private CustomSettableFuture(
 
     public void resolve()
     {
-      synchronized (statusRefs) {
+      synchronized (requestStatusesLock) {
         if (isDone()) {
           return;
         }
 
-        List<DataSegmentChangeRequestAndStatus> result = new 
ArrayList<>(statusRefs.size());
-        statusRefs.forEach(
-            (request, statusRef) -> result.add(new 
DataSegmentChangeRequestAndStatus(request, statusRef.get()))
-        );
+        final List<DataSegmentChangeRequestAndStatus> result = new 
ArrayList<>(statusRefs.size());
+        statusRefs.forEach((request, statusRef) -> {
+          // Remove complete statuses from the cache

Review Comment:
   This code could probably do with some cleanup and doing what had been 
originally suggested [in this 
comment](https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/11717#discussion_r723833447) i.e. 
maintaining the cache (or really just a concurrent map) at the `DataSegment` 
level itself rather than `DataSegmentChangeRequest`.
   
   But I wanted to keep the footprint of this PR low so that we could include 
it in Druid 27 release. We can take up a more holistic overhaul later. Let me 
know what you think.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to