commits  

Messages by Date

• 2025/02/28 [I] java.lang.ClassCastException while serializing a complex Java object [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/27 Re: [I] [Question] Deserialization error when registering multiple classes in XLANG mode with non-Java Peer Language [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 Re: [I] [Question] About the performance of ThreadSafeFury when using VirtualThread [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 [I] [Question] About the performance of ThreadSafeFury when using VirtualThread [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 (fury) branch main updated: feat(javascript): Speed up string serializer (#2083) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/25 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): Speed up string serializer [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): removing HPS [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): removing HPS [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/25 [PR] feat(javascript): Speed up string serializer [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/24 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/23 Re: [I] [Java] The initialization size of the classIdGenerator is different between JDK 8 and JDK 8+ [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/23 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): fix ImmutableCollections$SubList duplicate registration (#2074) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/23 Re: [PR] fix(java): fix ImmutableCollections$SubList duplicate registration [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/23 Re: [I] [Java] The initialization size of the classIdGenerator is different between JDK 8 and JDK 8+ [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/22 Re: [I] [Question] Serialization in Kotlin and deserialization in java [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/22 [I] [Question] Serialization in Kotlin and deserialization in java [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/21 (fury) branch main updated: perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api (#2078) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/21 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/21 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/21 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] Update snapshot version [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 (fury) branch chaokunyang-patch-1 created (now 48059b9f) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/20 [PR] docs: Update to latest version [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [PR] Update snapshot version [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 (fury) branch main updated: Update snapshot version (#2081) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 (fury) branch chaokunyang-patch-1 deleted (was 48059b9f) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/20 (fury) 01/01: Update snapshot version chaokunyang
• 2025/02/20 (fury-site) branch main updated: 🔄 synced local 'docs/guide/' with remote 'docs/guide/' chaokunyang
• 2025/02/20 (fury) branch main updated: docs: Update to latest version (#2080) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] docs: Update to latest version [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] Update companies.json [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [PR] Update companies.json [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [PR] add more users [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] add more users [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): Impl xlang [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] [Java]Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] [Java]Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] [Java]Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [I] Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [I] Fury With IBM Semeru OpenJ9 run Error [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 [PR] perf(python): Optimize sequence buffer writing via the c-api [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [I] [Question] Deserialization error when registering multiple classes in XLANG mode with non-Java Peer Language [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] fix(java): fix ImmutableCollections$SubList duplicate registration [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): Impl xlang [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): Impl xlang [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 Re: [I] [Java]In deep copy scenarios, java.util.Date is often mistakenly considered an immutable class. [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PR] fix(java): java.util.Date and its subclasses are mutable [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): java.util.Date and its subclasses are mutable (#2076) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [PR] fix(java) java.util.Date and its subclasses are mutable [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [PR] feat(javascript): Impl xlang [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 Re: [I] [Rust] Please publish fury for rust to crates.io [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 Re: [D] Unable to build Java directory using the build instructions? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 (fury) branch main updated: perf(java): Optimize Computational Efficiency of MetaStringEncoder::encodeGeneric (#2072) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PR] perf(java): Optimize Computational Efficiency of MetaStringEncoder::encodeGeneric [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/19 [PR] fix(java):fix ImmutableCollections$SubList duplicate registration [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/19 Re: [D] Unable to build Java directory using the build instructions? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/18 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/18 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/18 [PR] perf(java): Optimize Computational Efficiency of MetaStringEncoder::encodeGeneric [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Java]In deep copy scenarios, java.util.Date is often mistakenly considered an immutable class. [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question] Is there a benchmark comparison with proto buffer? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Java]In deep copy scenarios, java.util.Date is often mistakenly considered an immutable class. [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 [I] [Java]In deep copy scenarios, java.util.Date is often mistakenly considered an immutable class. [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question] 对C++的支持有计划表吗 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Java] The initialization size of the classIdGenerator is different between JDK 8 and JDK 8+ [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Java] The initialization size of the classIdGenerator is different between JDK 8 and JDK 8+ [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 [I] [Java] The initialization size of the classIdGenerator is different between JDK 8 and JDK 8+ [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): fix read primitives error on fill buffer bound (#2064) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PR] fix(java): fix read primitives error on fill buffer bound [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] Wrong deserialization result when deserializing a POJO type containing double fields using `FuryInputStream` with the initial buffer size < the serialized buffer size of a single record [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/18 Re: [I] Wrong deserialization result when deserializing a POJO type containing double fields using `FuryInputStream` with the initial buffer size < the serialized buffer size of a single record [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] Doubts in FuryJava's MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): Fix error with `MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64` when not in LITTLE_ENDIAN mode #2068 (#2069) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] fix(java): Fix error with `MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64` when not in LITTLE_ENDIAN mode #2068 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/17 [PR] fix(java): Fix error with `MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64` when not in LITTLE_ENDIAN mode #2068 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] Doubts in FuryJava's MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] Doubts in FuryJava's MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [I] [Question] Doubts in FuryJava's MemoryBuffer::readBytesAsInt64 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [PR] fix(java): fix read null chunk out of bound [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] How to force codegen serializer for custom JDK serialization? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] How to force codegen serializer for custom JDK serialization? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] How to force codegen serializer for custom JDK serialization? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Question] How to force codegen serializer for custom JDK serialization? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] Wrong deserialization result when deserializing a POJO type containing double fields using `FuryInputStream` with the initial buffer size < the serialized buffer size of a single record [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Java][v0.10.0] Exception when deserializing map with null values [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 (fury-site) branch main updated: 🔄 synced local 'docs/guide/' with remote 'docs/guide/' chaokunyang
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Java][v0.10.0] Exception when deserializing map with null values [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): fix read null chunk out of bound (#2065) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] fix(java): fix read null chunk out of bound [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [I] [Question] How to force codegen serializer for custom JDK serialization? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Java][v0.10.0] Exception when deserializing map with null values [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [PR] fix(java): fix read primitives error on fill buffer bound [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [I] [Question][Java] Why Guava types are registered by default? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 (fury-site) branch main updated: fix: replace the removed withSecureMode API by requireClassRegistration (#209) pandalee
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PR] fix: replace the removed withSecureMode API by requireClassRegistration [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [I] [Java][v0.10.0] Exception when deserializing map with null values [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 Re: [I] [Java] implement fast utf16 to utf8 conversion [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/17 [PR] fix: replace the removed withSecureMode API by requireClassRegistration [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [I] [Question] 对C++的支持有计划表吗 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): simplify the definition of object type description [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): simplify the definition of object type description [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [I] Wrong deserialization result when deserializing a POJO type containing double fields using `FuryInputStream` with the initial buffer size < the serialized buffer size of a single record [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 (fury-site) branch main updated: Add author (#208) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] Add author [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 [PR] Add author [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] Post blog [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 (fury-site) branch main updated: Post blog (#207) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/16 [PR] Post blog [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 (fury-site) branch main updated: Release 0.10.0 (#205) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/16 [PR] Fix lint [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 (fury-site) branch main updated: Fix lint (#206) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] Fix lint [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [PR] Release 0.10.0 [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/16 Re: [PR] Release 0.10.0 [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2025/02/16 svn commit: r74921 - /dev/incubator/fury/0.10.0-rc1/ /release/incubator/fury/0.10.0/ wangweipeng
• 2025/02/14 Re: [D] How to provide a custom string ID for class registration rather than int ID? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/14 Re: [I] [Question] Is there a benchmark comparison with proto buffer? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/14 (fury) branch main updated: feat(javascript): simplify the definition of object type description (#2058) wangweipeng
• 2025/02/14 Re: [PR] feat(javascript): simplify the definition of object type description [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/13 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/13 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/13 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 (fury) branch main updated (3af277ab -> a6e60a55) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/13 Re: [PR] build(bazel): Extracts compile_commands.json [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 [PR] build(bazel): Extracts compile_commands.json [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/13 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/13 [PR] feat(javascript): simplify the definition of object type description [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [I] [Question] next release of apache fury? [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] perf(java): try to eliminate virtual function call for the kv serialization of Map<String, String> [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] feat(python): chunk based map serialization in pure python [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 (fury) branch main updated: feat(python): chunk based map serialization in pure python (#2037) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/12 Re: [I] [Rust] Please publish fury for rust to crates.io [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] feat(python): chunk based map serialization in pure python [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 (fury) branch main updated: perf(python): upgrade pyarrow version to 15.0.0 (#2056) chaokunyang
• 2025/02/12 Re: [I] [Java] fast serialization path for String KV map [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] perf(python): upgrade pyarrow version to 15.0.0 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 (fury-site) branch main updated: 🔄 synced local 'docs/guide/' with remote 'docs/guide/' chaokunyang
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] perf(python): upgrade pyarrow version to 15.0.0 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] perf(python): upgrade pyarrow version to 15.0.0 [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2025/02/12 Re: [I] [Java] fast serialization path for String KV map [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] fix(python): numpy2 is not currently supported [fury] via GitHub
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PR] fix(python): numpy2 is not currently supported [fury] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages