xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2215#issuecomment-725497073


   > > ```
   > > 1. When fetch isn't NULL, the intermediate buffer is disabled on 
sensor_register to save ram. Done on this patch.
   > > ```
   > 
   > I see. But the call to the buffer creation function is still done and if I 
understand correctly, due to the rounding up, one struct will be allocated in 
the buffer still.
   
   It isn't an issue more with new mm/circ_buf, so we can temporarily ignore it 
here.
   
   > 
   > > ```
   > > 2. I think we should move towards unification. If there is no conforming 
type or structure, we should add them and make them as versatile as possible. 
It's especially good for application developers.
   > > ```
   > 
   > I agree, but I'm thinking in the lines of something that wouldn't 
necessarily be ported upstream, leaving downstream user the possibility of 
defining a particular driver with specific needs. But we can go back to this 
later on.
   > 
   
   Ok, we can add a special register api later.
   
   > > Thank you.
   
   > > > > I'm looking at the changes. I wanted to ask, any reason why you are 
defining your own queue structure instead of using definitions in queue.h?
   > > > 
   > > > 
   > > > The circualr buffer and queue are different for their behavior. We 
need to overwrite old data when buffer is full, and it's better to operate 
buffer directly rather than queue node.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > I will add mm/circ_buf for circular buffer management on other patch 
later, and driver/sensor and driver/rc will call these api about circ_buf_xxx 
to use circular buffer.
   > 
   > Are you sure there's no circular buffer structure defined anywhere else in 
NuttX?
   
   We can't find one, could you point to a general and standalone 
implementation?
   
   > > Also, shouldn't the buffer be released on close() on the last reference? 
Right now it requires the unregistration of the sensor
   > 
   > What about this?
   
   Since the upcomming patch will replace the buffer implemenation to a common 
one, how about move this change to that PR?
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to