On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:21 am, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote: > > No one had volunteered yet. > > I'm happy to. Had been giving everyone time to play with builders as they > weren't something I had a great itch for. > > There are a lot of things we have on the post-release list, and Stephen's > got a good thing going in the STATUS.html to show post release ideas. I > suggest we all continue to add issues and ideas to that to signify things > we itch/care about, such as your introspection Steven. It's Steve who's got the introspection itch. Steven will have to scratch his own itches. <g>
> > Daniel's volunteered to handle the actual CVS whatnot. Tagging and > branching and whittling into shape, so it seems our process is: > > 1) Decide on what we want to go and what doesn't go. What's there now + Steven's planned fixes for exceptions? > 2) All agree that we're happy with the state of what is going, including > javadoc and unit tests. There's work to be done on the javadocs. Nothing crippling, but it could be better. The unit tests seem to be pretty good, though. > 3) Make a preliminery build available internally. I'd like to then run > JDiff on this with the beta. This hopefully can make us aware of any > issues. This means having tag stuff in cvs done at this point. > 4) Propose a vote for a 1.0 release. > 5) Worry about the website. I doubt we'll be doing a lot in the way of > tutorials or docs etc, but we need to make sure the simple bits we have > there are good. > 6) Ensure we are in Bugzilla. I'm not sure if we are yet. > 7) Release. > > Does this sound right to everyone? > > Hen Sounds good to me. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
