On Wednesday 18 September 2002 12:09 pm, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:57:52 -0400 (EDT) > > In earlier discussions on this topic, I thought the conclusion was that > [lang] would grab the MethodUtils class out of beanutils, and create a > corresponding ConstructorUtils class for dynamically invoking > constructors. At some appropriate time, [beanutils] could deprecate its > own version of MethodUtils and declare a dependence on [lang] for this > functionality. > > The rest of [beanutils] seems to me to be out of scope for [lang]. > Right now I've got some classes where introspection would be a natural extension. Using [beanutils] would certainly make it easier. In fact, it would be nice to support DynaBeans, too. But that creates a moderately painful build dependency.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
