On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. FastDateFormat doesn't seem to be as thread > safe as advertised (at least in the version we are using.) There are a > few instances of HashMap (some of which I was already proposing to > eliminate b/c they are only being used by the getDateTimeInstance, etc. > methods). > > I looked at the FastHashMap as a replacement and I have some major > misgivings given the dire javadoc warnings and the equally pessimistic > article they reference. I don't see a problem with using Hashtable. Any particular reason not to use a synchronised Map? I guess it's the trade-off between the speed of a Hashtable and the nicer-API of a Map. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
