Wouldn't there be some thread-safety issues there? If not, then this is a possibility.
Any reason why we can't just delegate the parse() method to the
SimpleDateFormat?
If we don't extend Format, I think it should be called FastDateFormatter.How about we call it FastDateFormatter? Then if we get ambitious enough, we add the rest of the stuff to make it truly extend DateFormat (and rename it back to FastDateFormat).
I wonder if FastDateFormatter is useful enough if you couldn't create Dates with it? I maintain it is, because there are several times where I have the system date/time and need to format it. What do others think?
- sean
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
