I'm interested in the reasoning about using 1.1 for small bugfix release (including extra docs). I think v1.0.1 would be more fitting. IMHO a v2 would likely include very significant new function or maybe even a rearchitecture. v1.1 should contain new function and v1.0.1 would include bug fixes, doc updates etc. Users of v1.0 not requiring new function would likely upgrade to v1.0.x quite readily in the knowledge that only bugs have been fixed and no new (potentially disruptive) functional changes have been made. Most projects in my experience do it like this ... eg Axis
So I'm +1 for a release. But maybe call it v1.0.1. Thx, Jeremy On 3/27/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. > > Sanjiva. > > On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 15:07 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > +1 > > > > I am travelling a lot this week, but I can help do the release this > > weekend. > > - Dan > > > > Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I just commited some documentation (still at the maven 1 structure > > > though) and a patched up build script that generates binary and source > > > distributions for the XMLSchema. > > > Since the last XMLSchema release hardly had any documentation and due > > > to the fixing of several crucial bugs (such as errorneous > > > serialization of the schema in JDK 1.5) I propose > > > we do a commons XMLSchema 1.1 release. > > > > > > here is my +1 for the XMLSchema 1.1 release. > > > -- > > > Ajith Ranabahu > > > > > > > > >
